News:

Welcome to the Chironomid Exchange Forum! Use this resource to discuss midge matters with the world-wide community of researchers, and to stay up-to-date on important data, e.g. in standard reference publications.
Please report to moderators any spammers or attempts to use this forum for purposes other than the exchange of scientific information related to the science of Chironomidae or entomology. Thank you!
Ethan and Martin - Moderators

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What family name are non-biting midges?:
In what Meigen 1800 family name is Orthocladius?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Bruno Rossaro
 - December 07, 2023, 09:19:55 AM
Yes surely; unfortunately the wings are not in good condition so it is not clear if Cu brings setae; median volsella lamellae are also difficult to analyze, but I cannot exclude that they are branched; body colour is very light suggesting T. heusdensis, because T. reei is described with darker vittae, only the enlarged digitus suggests T. reei; Molgora is a stream in lowland, the habitat is also compatible with T. heusdensis.
My conclusion is that the species is T.heusdensis, the presence of T.reei in Italy at present is not supported.
Posted by Wojciech Giłka
 - December 06, 2023, 07:11:40 PM
Not exactly as Bruno wrote. The structure of tibial cobms and spurs is rather weak character for separation the two genera - combs can be slightly separated and armed with a short spur in both Tanytarsus and Paratanytarsus.
Besides, I was able to see hypopygium only. The presence of spinulae (absent in Paratanytarsus) is the best key character in this case. The species fits the concept of the heusdensis group and should be compared with T. reei.
Posted by Wojciech Giłka
 - December 06, 2023, 06:59:31 PM
Looks similar to Tanytarsus reei Na et Bae, 2010 (Tanytarsus heusdensis group)
Posted by Bruno Rossaro
 - December 06, 2023, 06:54:40 PM
An important addition; I overlooked tibial combs, they are clearly separated, this character suggests Tanytarsus not Paratanytarsus as genus; I thanks Wojciech Gilka for the having put me on the advice
Posted by Bruno Rossaro
 - December 06, 2023, 04:25:41 PM
Yes Molgora is a stream running at East of Milano;
I suspected some similarity with P. corsicanus (publ. in Fauna Norvegica) but anal point in dorsal aspect seems different, and I have not the lateral aspect; digitus seems also different, only median volsella is similar
Posted by Martin Spies
 - December 06, 2023, 02:53:33 PM
Dear Bruno,

In order to narrow down the range of references that may have to be consulted: Do I gather correctly that the source for your material is the Torrente Molgora, a (?fast-)running water East of Milano?

Best,

Martin Spies
Posted by bruno.rossaro@unimi.it
 - December 06, 2023, 02:10:36 PM
The species has a characteristic anal point a short median volsella and a superior volsella with a large digitus, can somebody help me in identification ?paratanyt_nsp_Molgora_17X09_SV_x100.jpg